What happened with low cost sugar beet Brazilian bio fuels fuels?

January 27, 2012

BP, Amyris, et al. have bet the farm (excuse the pun) on sugar based biofuels being the low cost, high production holy grail.  Brazil has been an exporter of sugar-based Ethanol, whereas the US has produced much less efficient corn based ethanol for domestic consumption with our domestic market protected by both (1) a  tax credit and (2) a $0.35/gal tariff on sugar based ethanol (i.e., to keep out Brazil).  Beginning in Jan 2012, both the tax credit (really a much protected corn subsidy) went away (thank the efforts of budgetary concerns) and the sugar ethanol tariff expired.  What was expected was for Brazil to export ethanol into US and negatively affecting the production of corn based ethanol.

But wait, the US is exporting ethanol to Brazil in January 2012.  What happened?

I just learned that the low cost sugar beets in Brazil have been going up in price so much that the bizarre is happening in the markets and Brazil is importing “cheaper” corn based ethanol from the US!?!?

Conclusion:  food based biofuels feedstock markets are widely unpredictable.  Then again, let’s wait to see how the markets settle out over time.

Shale Recovery in US; Impact on Alternative Fuels?

December 31, 2011

Currently there is a huge BTU/$ spread on gas and oil in the US (gas is trading at the equivalent of $18/bbl today).  There is now a secondary issue that is roiling the local markets is the Brent/WTI spread which tracks the price of global oil (Brent) to sweet crude shipped from Cushing refineries in OK (WTI… Western Texas Intermediate). The Brent/WTI is practically an even correlation for decades… until the back half of 2011 where the spread reached nearly $15/barrel (i.e., crude oil was cheaper in the US by an historically unprecedented 15%). And here is the kicker… the arbitrage guys are not filling in the gap because the natural thing to occur is to expect that WTI will catch up with Brent. So what’s going on? In part, oil shale findings in the US are turning over a 40 year trend in reduced oil reserves in the US. In Mid November, Andarko announced 1-2 Billion (yes, with a “B”) barrels of new recoverable oil reserves in Colorado in an area known as the Niobrara ( the same Niobrara PEDOC has development lease rights). New findings in the Bakken (i.e. North Dakota), is expected to produce over one Million barrels a day in a few short years (the entire US produced less than 7MBPD in 2010). Sandridge just spent over $1B buying practically 2M acres in the OK & KS in an oil/shale gas field known as the Mississippian, with expectations of adding 10-20 Billion barrels of new reserves in the US. Enbridge just recently spent over $1B to buy a pipeline designed to bring oil from the gulf coast into US refineries with the explicit intention of REVERSING the flow of oil from the US interior to the Gulf Coast for export. The US, which had a growing percent of oil imported to the tune of a peak of nearly 65% imported, dropped toward 45% two weeks ago (and the oil import slide is expected to continue). Goldman Sachs issued a report earlier this month stating the US will likely be a Net Exporter of oil by 2017. The point is, that oil inventories are backing up in the mid west. There is a lack of pipelining from North Dakota all the way down and thru all these fields to the Gulf Coast (don’t get me started on the Keystone XL pipeline which I believe is an absolute necessary piece of infrastructure for US energy distribution). So in country availability is growing, pricing is dropping (there is a lag to the pump), and the Brent/WTI spread grew. One can only guess what this may all mean for long term pricing and the Alternative Fuel markets.

Asia and Developing Countries: Investment and Operating Execution of Cleantech Promise

September 19, 2010

For the last few years, I have been noting the advancing rise of cleantech venture investment which was essentially non-existent in 2003 as alternative energy (as it was then called) was not a focus area for the traditional venture community.  Over the past few years venture firms have scrubbed through their historical portfolio companies re-labeling prior investments to cleantech where they can to show their long-term commitment to the area.  The U.S. is more open to accepting failure enabling innovation resulting in the largest collection of venture capitalists and their benefactors, the entrepreneurs and their nascent company ideas to have a change to become products and eventually successful businesses.   However, what has been learned is that cleantech is not the capital efficient business of Internet or software investment, and has the capital requirements of a full-blown semi-conductor facility (e.g., like with PV solar), coupled with the regulatory issues of biotech (requiring testing, approvals and permitting), with an overlay of government support and mandates required to make the business economically viable.  And here is the rub… the U.S. lack of long-term planning (aside from the support of EVs and associated Batteries) for renewable energy, taxes on carbon, and generally long-term commitment, has resulted in the development of an idea here in the U.S., but the large scale deployment (which creates jobs and a broader tax base) is occurring overseas, particularly in China.  The article written by Thomas Friedman of the NY Times resonates well (particularly since I knew of the company he mentions and witnessed the difficulty of that recycling business to scale here in the US whereas it is experiencing success in China):    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/19/opinion/19friedman.html

A Green Future?

March 6, 2009

It is easy to get caught up in thinking that the green craze sweeping the country is a new phenomenon, but it is important to remember it has historical roots. Over four long decades, the U.S. has made halting progress toward energy independence, a reduction of fossil fuels and a general concern for environmental issues, but that progress still faces many challenges. With the introduction of a new U.S. federal administration, the continued growth of “clean” technologies around the globe and a lagging global economy, Worldwide Capital Group feels it is prudent to reflect on the global direction of clean technology and the United States’ positioning within the world as a green power.

We can examine the jagged growth of wind power in the U.S. as a representation of U.S. clean technology policy in general. In 1986, California had installed over 1.2GW of wind power, nearly 90% of global installations at the time. By 2000, Europe had nearly 12,000MW installed vs. only 2,500 MW for the United States. Only with the re-introduction of federal legislation has the U.S. begun to re-challenge the world for top wind producer. Unfortunately, the wind production tax credits (“PTC”) have expired three times in seven years. Until large scale clean technologies can compete cost effectively with traditional energy sources, government support will be required to sustain growth. Consider the growth of solar energy during the 1970s in response to the U.S. energy crisis and support from the government, the relative lull in production during the 1980s and 1990s and the rapid growth during the late 2000s, culminating in 48.0% growth in 2007 as a result of state and federal policies and incentives. Future growth depends upon continued incentives and improved efficiencies along the supply chain until the price is competitive with traditional fossil fuels.

It is clear that assistance from the federal government is necessary to propel many green technologies in the United States. Consider that by the 1960s there was concern over pollution, perhaps most clearly highlighted by the publication of Silent Spring by Rachel Carson, the growing size of landfills and the extinction of animals. In the words of Joel Makower, environmental issues were “local, immediate, visible…and thus solvable.” From this concern came the U.S. EPA, Greenpeace and the Endangered Species Act. As the decades progressed, the environmental problems morphed as individuals and companies began to look for the sources of pollution and ways to effectively manage them. Over forty years have passed and the environment remains one of the top concerns.

That leads us to the current U.S. administration and a desire to see President Obama implement many of the green strategies he talked about on the campaign trail. It is quite common now to see regularly occurring studies stating consumers are willing to buy green products, but only if those products are as efficient as what they are replacing, require little or no extra effort on the consumers’ part to operate, and cost the same as their replacements. In a February 2009 study, more than half of consumers (54.0%) surveyed by Mintel said they would buy more green products if they weren’t so expensive. Unfortunately, many green technologies will remain more expensive than “traditional” products for years to come. Hence, the role of the government in promoting green technologies.

President Obama, commenting on the stimulus bill, stated “…it’s an investment that will double the amount of renewable energy produced over the next three years.” With over $30.0 billion earmarked for clean energy, WCG is optimistic about many potential growth sectors. Most promising in the opinion of WCG is the nearly $2.0 billion for research into batteries for electric cars, a three-year extension of the “production tax credit” for wind energy, and $6.0 billion for loans for renewable energy power generation and transmission projects.

These political developments in the United States are very positive. Unfortunately, as highlighted above, even the most well intentioned U.S. policies struggle. It is the belief of WCG that much of the growth in energy efficient systems and clean technologies will continue to happen outside of the United States. More favorable political climates, exploding populations and cultural variances all offer companies tantalizing opportunities in a wide range of global markets. Referencing Joel Makower again, our current environmental problems may best be represented as “global, largely invisible, resulting from millions of sources over a century…”, but that does not mean they are not solvable. At WCG, we believe that companies in the U.S. and abroad will continue to find innovative solutions.

Hello world!

January 21, 2009

We are pleased to welcome you to the Worldwide Capital Group Clean Technology Blog. We welcome your insights, critiques, suggestions and comments. We hope to use the forum to expand on (and to challenge) current thinking in a rapidly changing and growing sector that is crucial to our  local and global community.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.